Run Analysis
Describe your strategic problem. Be specific - the more context, the sharper the analysis.
INITIALIZING
Activating knowledge base...
Live Analysis Stream
How useful was this analysis?
What could have been better? Your feedback directly improves future analyses.
Thanks. Your feedback trains our Auto Research engine to deliver sharper analysis.
Your feedback improves the engine
Every rating trains the knowledge engine. Low scores flag gaps. High scores reinforce what works. The engine gets sharper with every session.
1 of 3 cognitive lenses applied
What this analysis couldn't see
You ran one lens. Each catches a different class of blind spot. Here's what the other two would examine:
Twelve cognitive lenses argue your strategy across six deliberate rounds.
Full transcript, synthesis, and concrete offer. Delivered within 4 hours. $97 founding rate (standard $497).
Your free analysis has been used
That was a single-pass demo. The Structural Read puts twelve cognitive lenses against your strategy across six deliberate rounds and delivers a full transcript, synthesis, and concrete offer within 4 hours.
Structural Read delivered within 4 hours. Strategy session includes 90-min live walkthrough.
Free analysis already used on this device
Ready for the full analysis? Twelve cognitive lenses argue your strategy across six deliberate rounds against 320,000+ knowledge claims. Full transcript, synthesis, and concrete offer within 4 hours.
Analysis Ordered
Your analysis is running. You'll receive a confirmation email shortly, and a second email with your full report when it's ready.
Most reports complete within 4 hours.
Analysis Failed
Common questions
- What does the free analysis actually do?
- It reads your strategic problem through a single lens and returns results instantly, which is enough to see the shape of the output and whether the read lands. The paid Structural Read is the adversarial version: twelve cognitive lenses argue the same problem across six rounds and you get the full transcript alongside the synthesis.
- How is this different from asking ChatGPT the same question?
- A single model answers from a single perspective and tends to agree with the framing you hand it. Pharallax holds twelve adversarial perspectives at once and treats convergence between them as the signal. A finding that survives disagreement across lenses is structural. A finding only one lens raises is stylistic and gets dropped before it reaches you.
- What should I write in the problem field?
- Describe the decision or constraint you are actually sitting with, in specifics rather than in category terms. Numbers, timelines, and the thing you have already ruled out are the most useful context, because the analysis works by testing load-bearing assumptions and it can only test the ones you make visible.
- What are the Candy Poison and Raw delivery modes?
- They change the tone of the report, not its conclusions. Candy Poison warms the truth before it cuts, which is easier to read and easier to share with a team. Raw states the read straight with no cushioning. The underlying findings are identical either way.